Detroit Electric Essay

1. What compositional twist do you believe is being utilise to asseverate Detroit galvanizing vehicles? Detroit Electric concentrates theirs efforts on explore and discipline of the motor, vehicle traffic pattern, marketing and distribution. The troupe does not produce cars the actual manufacturing of cars is outsourced. From the fictional character I conclude that technology design is the core business of Detroit Electric. Technology changes cursorily and therefore Detroit Electric has to be tensile in conditions of change and uncertainty.Technical morality and efficient use of resources is the key to contest and to avoid wastage as the cost of R&D is high. Based upon the above observation, I believe that the organizational structure used is the matrix model. 2. How has differing organizational structures influenced the pace of development between these two companies? crossover and Detroit Electric be both car companies. The major(ip) difference is that Ford manufactur es cars whereas Detroit Electric does not. Fords organizational structure testament most likely resemble some other manufacturers structure, i. e. functional departmentalization.A major loss of this structure is that because specialists are working with and advance each other in their areas of expertise and interest, organizational goals may be sacrificed in favor of departmental goals hence, the inability to form efforts amongst competing department to achieve the goal of producing galvanizing vehicles. Detroit Electrics matrix structure on the other hand gives the organization the flexibility to respond to challenges faster in conditions of change and uncertainty hence their relation pace (fast)in developing electric cars.3. What unlooses may surface from this cooperative arrangement of outside(a) companies? The first issue is control. How does Detroit Electric go through that their exact specifications are followed by their licensees? constant audits will have to be conducted and these audits are costly. Who will bear responsibility if problems arise (faulty products) due to failure of any of its licensees do not follow procedures? The second issue is differences in objectives. For example, Detroit Electrics surgery and quality standards objectives may differ from their licensees.